The Face on Mars

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Ann Cohen on August 28, 2009 at 3:10am

The natural wonders!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by lafe garnier on August 28, 2009 at 3:44am

Notice the balance of the stones or objects behind the face. They actually give the Face more credituals. It is a piece of art from above, but on the ground there had to be some significance.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Tan Soo Giap on August 28, 2009 at 3:52am

Hi Max,
It's amazing that you can do so much in depth analysis.
After viewing your gif, I still cannot comprehend.
Maybe you can lead me to the way , the truth and the light by giving more elaboration.

Light, life and love,

SG

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Max Kiejzik on August 28, 2009 at 4:10am

Hi SG, nice to meet you.

I've done SO much analyses over the past 4 years it would be difficult to begin to summarize in a single post.

I suggest clicking on the following link and either download or view the appropriate Truth & Light power point presentation. (Appropriate to your computer's resolution capabilities)

http://www.maxtheknife.com/navigationwebpage/navigationwebpage.htm

From there, move on to "Stubborn Assumptions" and the other pages I've published which correct a few critical mistakes I made in Truth & Light and subsequently lead me to the sequencing and interpretation of the .gif you've already seen.

The only pages I think one could skip are, "Splitting Hairs" and "The Key". I refrence the work presented there frequently in other pages. You can come back to them and read in detail later if the refrences I made to them interest you.

If something I've presented isn't clear... Please ask me! I'll be happy to clarify.

All the best,

max

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Max Kiejzik on August 28, 2009 at 7:51am

Hi again, SG...

You might be interested to read my reply to Mary Guariglia... scroll down to find it.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Max Kiejzik on August 28, 2009 at 5:49am

Au contraire

"Confabulated"? Which photo specifically?

If you mean... fabricated, I can prove the only "orthographically rectified" image of the Face (published by MSSS ) is in fact... FALSIFIED.

Link to Full res ~4mb: http://www.maxtheknife.com/052709/05270914.jpg

As of today, I've nearly 700,000 web hits. I could care less about a few hundred or thousand more. So please, spare me the spamming accusations and just read what I'm trying to share w/ you. Then provide some actual points for debate if you still don't 'get it'.

Btw... I'd love to see some actual analysis from any of your so-called experts.

Attachments:

• 06090911.jpg, 6.2 MB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Max Kiejzik on August 30, 2009 at 4:11pm

Nonsense.

I'm sure you're more than capable of evaluating the many truths I've presented and realizing their profound implications for yourself(ves).

Think for yourself(ves).

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Max Kiejzik on August 31, 2009 at 4:02am

Ps... for the record, I've have not, nor have I ever claimed to have corresponded w/ Graham Hancock.

I do have the utmost respect for his research and work, though. =)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Max Kiejzik on August 31, 2009 at 2:04pm

Lolol... Are you suggesting SkinWalker's comments actually hold water?

His blatant strawman garbage?!

It's common sense that cultures align just about everything according to TRUE n/s/e/w.

If one reads my entire premise, his singular arguement was classic strawman.

Come off it.

I took the high ground in that so-called 'debate' by NOT devolving into what was clearly vitriolic rhetoric from the beginning.

Think for yourself... do the WORK... the conclusions are...

Inescapable.

The time for silliness is over.

Ps... it's MaxtheKnife not Mack. =)
Oh... and here's a link to the nonsense of "SkinWalker", the so-called "scientist"... lolol... http://www.thescienceforum.com/Intro-to-MaxtheKnife.com-19991t.php

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Max Kiejzik on September 1, 2009 at 1:38am

You're missing the point & the context, John... as did Skinwalker. In doing so, you're making a 'strawman'... And not a very good one either.

How do you explain this demonstrably false representation of True North?

Link to proof ~7mb: http://www.maxtheknife.com/images/021408/10.jpg

Not to mention you haven't even bothered to touch my earlier link proving Malin published falsified 'ortho' data.

Inescapable. =)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Max Kiejzik on September 1, 2009 at 7:23am

And still... you choose to ignore the simple fact.

True north is NOT where ESA has it notated.

Unless one intends to argue Mars is not tilted on it's axis by 25.19 degrees, there's absolutely NO getting around the following...

ESA and to a greater extent Malin, have falsified their data.

Inescapable.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Max Kiejzik on September 1, 2009 at 11:01am

J.T. Writes: Thank you for your strident "conclusion."

Strident to you perhaps, because it's inescapable.

I've made my point.

This circular conversation is now over.

I shall waste no more energy on you.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• Next ›
• Page