James Holmes, the Aurora, Colorado shooter who reportedly opened fire at a Batman movie premiere, was a medical student at the University of Colorado, pursuing a PhD in neuroscience, reports ABC News. (http://abcnews.go.com/US/mass-shooting-colorado-movie-theater-14-pe...)
As part of the attack, Holmes painted his hair red and referred to himself as "The Joker," one of the arch enemies in the DC Comics-inspired Batman movie series. (http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2012/07/20/police-14-dead-in-colorado-t...)
According to news reports, this sudden violent rampage was completely out of character for James Holmes, who was described as "shy."
The New York Times is now reporting:
Billy Kromka, a pre-med student at the University of Colorado, Boulder, worked with Mr. Holmes for three months last summer as a research assistant in a lab of at the Anschutz Medical Campus. Mr. Kromka said he was surprised to learn Mr. Holmes was the shooting suspect. "It was just shocking, because there was no way I thought he could have the capacity to do commit an atrocity like this," he said. (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/21/us/colorado-mall-shooting.html?pa...)
"He spent much of his time immersed in the computer, often participating in role-playing online games..."
There is already conjecture that James Holmes may have been involved in mind-altering neuroscience research and ended up becoming involved at a depth he never anticipated. His actions clearly show a strange detachment from reality, indicating he was not in his right mind. That can only typically be accomplished through drugs, hypnosis or trauma (and sometimes all three).
His behavior already reveals stark inconsistencies that question the mainstream explanation of events. For example, he opened fire on innocent people but then calmly surrendered to police without resistance. This is not consistent with the idea of "killing everyone."
Furthermore, he then admitted to police that his apartment was booby-trapped with explosives. If you were really an evil-minded Joker trying to kill people (including cops), why would you warn them about the booby trap in advance? It doesn't add up.
"Holmes was taken into custody shortly after the shooting, police said, adding he didn't resist when he was arrested," reports a local CBS news affiliate (http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2012/07/20/police-14-dead-in-colorado-t...).
"After his arrest, Holmes told police about 'possible explosives in his residence,' Oates said. When police searched his apartment, they discovered it was booby-trapped and evacuated surrounding buildings, police said. Oates said bomb technicians are determining how to disarm flammable or explosive material in the third-floor apartment. He said police could be there some time."
None of this checks out. If you're a killer bent on causing mayhem, why tell the police about your surprise bomb waiting for them back at your apartment?
Continuing from CBS:
"He said pictures from inside the apartment are fairly disturbing and the devices look to be sophisticated, adding the booby-traps were 'something I've never seen.' One rifle, two handguns, a knife, a bullet proof vest, a ballistic helmet, a gas device, a gas mask, military SWAT clothing and unidentified explosives were also found in Holmes' car, a law enforcement source told CBS News. Oates said Holmes wore a gas mask, a ballistic helmet and vest as well as leg, groin and throat protectors during the shooting."
In other words, this guy was equipped with exotic gear by someone with connections to military equipment. SWAT clothing, explosives, complex booby-traps... c'mon, this isn't a "lone gunman." This is somebody who was selected for a mission, given equipment to carry it out, then somehow brainwashed into getting it done.
"Aurora Police Chief Dan Oates said Holmes' apartment is booby-trapped with a 'sophisticated' maze of flammable devices. It could take hours or days for authorities to disarm it," reports Yahoo News (http://sg.sports.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/suspect-neuroscience-phd-s...).
This is not your run-of-the-mill crime of passion. It was a carefully planned, heavily funded and technically advanced attack. Who might be behind all this? The FBI, of course, which has a long history of setting up and staging similar attacks, then stopping them right before they happen. See four documented stories on these facts:
As you soak all this in, remember that the FBI had admitted to setting up terror plots, providing the weapons and gear, staging the location of the bombings and even driving the vehicles to pull it off! This is not a conspiracy theory, it's been admitted by the FBI right out in the open. Even the New York Times openly reports all this in stories like this one:
NYT: Terrorist Plots, Hatched by the F.B.I. (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/29/opinion/sunday/terrorist-plots-he...)
THE United States has been narrowly saved from lethal terrorist plots in recent years -- or so it has seemed. A would-be suicide bomber was intercepted on his way to the Capitol; a scheme to bomb synagogues and shoot Stinger missiles at military aircraft was developed by men in Newburgh, N.Y.; and a fanciful idea to fly explosive-laden model planes into the Pentagon and the Capitol was hatched in Massachusetts. But all these dramas were facilitated by the F.B.I., whose undercover agents and informers posed as terrorists offering a dummy missile, fake C-4 explosives, a disarmed suicide vest and rudimentary training. ...the F.B.I. provided a van loaded with six 55-gallon drums of “inert material,” harmless blasting caps, a detonator cord and a gallon of diesel fuel to make the van smell flammable. An undercover F.B.I. agent even did the driving...
On top of all this, Holmes apparently has no background. "He's not on anybody's radar screen -- nothing," said a peace officer in a NYT article. "This guy is somewhat of an enigma. Nobody knows anything about him." (http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/21/us/colorado-mall-shooting.html)
Mr. Holmes's only criminal history is a traffic summons, the authorities said. He earned a bachelor's degree with honors in neuroscience in 2010 from the University of California, Riverside, and was a graduate student in neurosciences at the University of Colorado at Denver's Anschutz Medical Campus... He was currently collecting unemployment...
More and more, this shooting is looking like a deliberate plot staged by the government itself much like Operation Fast and Furious pulled off by the ATF (http://www.naturalnews.com/032934_ATF_illegal_firearms.html) which helped smuggle tens of thousands of guns into Mexico for the purpose of causing "gun violence" in the USA, then blaming the Second Amendment for it.
All this looks like James Holmes completed a "mission" and then calmly ended that mission by surrendering to police and admitting everything. The mission, as we are now learning, was to cause as much terror and mayhem as possible, then to have that multiplied by the national media at exactly the right time leading up the UN vote next week on a global small arms treaty that could result in gun confiscation across America. (http://lewrockwell.com/eddlem/eddlem61.1.html)
Even Forbes.com wrote about this quite extensively, warning readers about the coming gun confiscation effort related to the UN treaty. The story was authored by Larry Bell (http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybell/2011/06/07/u-n-agreement-shou...) and says the UN treaty could "override our national sovereignty, and in the process, provide license for the federal government to assert preemptive powers over state regulatory powers guaranteed by the Tenth Amendment in addition to our Second Amendment rights."
In other words, this has all the signs of Fast & Furious, Episode II. I wouldn't be surprised to discover someone in Washington was behind it all. After all, there's no quicker way to disarm a nation and take total control over the population than to stage violence, blame it on firearms, then call for leaders to "do something!" Such calls inevitably end up resulting in gun confiscation, and it's never too long after that before government genocide really kicks in like we saw with Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Mao and other tyrants.
Here's a short list of government mass murder carried out throughout history, almost always immediately following the disarmament of the public (and usually involving staged false flag events to justify the disarmament):
50+ million dead: Mao Ze-Dong (China, 1958-61 and 1966-69, Tibet 1949-50)
12+ million dead: Adolf Hitler (Germany, 1939-1945) - concentration camps, civilian deaths and dead Russian POWs
8+ million dead: Leopold II of Belgium (Congo, 1886-1908)
6+ million dead: Jozef Stalin (USSR, 1932-39)
5+ million dead: Hideki Tojo (Japan, 1941-44)
2+ million dead: Ismail Enver (Turkey, 1915-22)
1.7 million dead: Pol Pot (Cambodia, 1975-79)
1.6 million dead: Kim Il Sung (North Korea, 1948-94)
1.5 million dead: Menghistu (Ethiopia, 1975-78)
1 million dead: Yakubu Gowon (Biafra, 1967-1970)
900,000 dead: Leonid Brezhnev (Afghanistan, 1979-1982)
800,000 dead: Jean Kambanda (Rwanda, 1994)
See more at:
Death by government:
So yes, James Holmes and other crazed shooters kill a number of people each year in random acts of violence. It's horrifying and wrong, but it's nothing compared to the millions of lives that governments tend to destroy when they gain total power over the populace.
The most dangerous thing in the world, it turns out, is not a crazy person with a rifle; it's a government with a "monopoly of force" over the entire population. And that's exactly what the UN spells out as its goal for the world: Stripping all power from individual citizens and handing "monopolies of force" to the governments of the world, shoring up their positions as the only "legitimate" power on the planet.
See this document entitled, "Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF)" policy paper No. 24:
As this document reveals, a table entitled "Governance solutions for reasserting the state monopoly on the use of force" lists the options available to governments to re-establish "monopolies of force" against their own people:
• (Re-)establish state monopoly
- Ownership of WMDs
- Safety Inspectorates
• Prohibit business activity
- Justice and Execution
- Deadly Force?
• Regulate/limit activities
- Private defense/security services
- Control of financial transfers
- Export controls
- Transport and infrastructure safety
- Environmental impact
Interestingly, that document also describes "terrorism" in a way that perfectly matches the Aurora, Colorado "Batman" movie theater shooter:
Terrorists aim to spread panic and fear in societies in order to achieve political goals, be they based on left- or right-wing, social-revolutionary, nationalistic or religious ideologies. They are organized in a clandestine way, most often in small groups and cells... Typical tactical means include kidnapping, hostage-taking, sabotage, murder, suicide attacks, vehicle bombs and improvised explosive devices.
This document is a goldmine of information about the globalist agenda to disarm and enslave the population. Check out page 28, which reads:
The legitimate monopoly of force should not be limited to the nation-state but should be based on the local, national, regional and the global levels.
Global Security Governance and the Monopoly of Force
At the global level no monopoly of violence exists. The UN Security Council already has a monopoly power to authorize the use of force at the global level, although the UN was never given the necessary means to exercise this authority, such as the capacity to implement sanctions, a police force and armed forces...
This deficiency in global governance acts as a bottleneck and a barrier to the creation of the democratically legitimized monopoly of violence that is globally required.
This story gets deep, doesn't it? Watch for more analysis here at NaturalNews.com, where we still fight for liberty and justice in a world that's increasingly becoming enslaved.
So difficult to believe everything is a conspiracy. I admit that when I first starting learning about 9/11 Conspiracy I thought oh no that is crazy. Given several years and reading much, watching various documentaries I have come to consider that yes it was a set up or at least the US government knew about it and let it happen.
This also is another perspective I find difficult to accept. I am not completely stubborn but my first reaction is "Not everything is a dark conspiracy. There are many unstable people in the world, many lost souls, many disturbed people. I am not sure every crazy shooting is a CIA cover up though.
I am not sure why, but when I awoke this morning to see this story all over the news, I immediately said to my husband that this is some kind of MK Ultra or other type of brainwash sceme to eradicate weapeans from Americans and soon after will be everyone else. Then after we are defensless, we get chipped and if we don't comply we die. Plain and simple. Man I wish people would wake up already - all this is being shoved in your face daily, several times a day as of late. WAKE UP PEOPLE, PULL YOUR HEADS OUT OF THE SAND AND MAKE THIS STOP, WE, THE PEOPLE ARE THE ONLY ONES WHO HAVE THE POWER, NOW LETS USE IT. WE ARE ONE AND WHAT HURTS OTHERS ALSO, IN THE END HURTS YOU AND YOUR FAMILY. PEACE OUT.
I have to agree with Mike on this one (as I do with MANY of his writings). This DOES have the feel of a "false flag" op...the same as the one that preceded the TSA installments of the x-ray machines (remember how they just happened to have those ready RIGHT after the underwear bomber?). It's the exact same formula as all of these events. They want to push an agenda through Congress (in this case the gun registry)....and to have it "justified" by something that just happened (the Dark Knight shooting), and they choose a university student (notoriously experimental and vulnerable to "idealistic" types of brainwashings). It's almost getting routine, you know? Does anyone else see/feel this as well?
In this case...I have got to say that the IDEA behind getting rid of all guns is noble, but the AGENDA behind it is not...disarm the regular folks so that the full power lies with them. I have to say further that...this will backfire on them. The IDEA and IDEAL is to get rid of all VIOLENCE and FEAR, in the Grand Scheme of Things....to make way for Peace and Love, our TRUE AGENDA. "They" are merely being used to achieve this aim...even though it's still being acted out on the usual misguided and patriarchal Old-World-Paradigm platform. One of these days we'll be able to achieve - COLLECTIVELY - what we need and truly want without all the B.S. violent stuff.
They don't like killings, I suppose thats why he did not use bombs.. Think of all the money they lose damm.
Those people could be made to die of cancer, morgellons,alzheimers or something and turn them a huge profit as they pay their lifes labour and worth off in installments before they die. Then they can use that money for more scares and warfare.
Just killing them like that? Not profitable.
Interesting theory but sometimes a Cigar is just a Cigar. It is not uncommon for very bright children to become detached if parents don't help them develop social skills and to see their gifted minds as something to help others. The Unibomber was super smart and also under the radar which is why it took so long to catch him. Let us wait until the authorities have a chance to talk to him before we get paranoid.
Sorry mr Freud LOL
If it was "not uncommon" or let me put it this way.
If it was common for very bright children to become detached and so inconsistent with their usual tendencies that they controvert themselves before and after, then it would have been a common phenomena and people would consider it "Normal adolescent behavior"
The "authorities" will just give us their own twist of what happened.
I am with you on this Nita.
This discussion puts an interesting twist on the whole story.
I am slowly going through this and reading the links. This is very well presented, I appreciate all the links to various articles, I am open my mind to the possibilities. I am always in shock when I consider how diabolical the FBI and the CIA Homeland Security is in creating events to alter the direction of global thought and emotion.
Thanks for posting this.
The 27 year old son of a friend of ours was killed in this shooting. I want to call this a meaningless, pointless murder of people whose only offense at the time was going to the movies. I am appalled that the media is so swift to attack the parents who brought their three month old baby to the theater with them, something I used to do as well as my baby was breastfed and a sound sleeper. It seems to me that something is amiss in this eagerness to attack the victims, blame the government, look for dark plots and conspiracies and otherwise shut down our ability to keep our minds open and search for the right questions.
This is not the first time that innocents have been killed or maimed by an angry person. School shootings, Gabriella Gifford incident, the Virginia tech shooting, it is something that is becoming a periodic event in our society and we need to go a little deeper in our questioning.
I personally believe that the vitriol and anger at the top of our political process is part of a real Trickle Down Effect that incites and inflames the already unbalanced and angry. The phrase "Second Amendment Solution" has been heard coming from people who should know better.
One thing I have learned in life is that before you ask the Divine for anything, you should first ask for the wisdom to know what you should be seeking. In this case we need to first seek the right questions and then search for the right answers.