One Vibration

One Vision - One Vibration

The Marko Rodin Free Energy Systems PART 2

The Marko Rodin Free Energy Systems- PART 2

 

“The Universe was created after 9 Conditions”

 

“Numbers are not modeling something; they are the model themselves…”

 

“LOVE = Tachyon particles = God’s neurons = Zero Point = the glue of Source”

 

“Spirit is Mechanical”

 

 

“The decimal system is NOT a man-made convention.”

 

Using the powers of ten we find a distinct pattern (you can see for yourself in the Rodin video, it’s too long to explain in detail here). The pattern shows us that this ‘system’ has a phasing in 3’s.

“1,2,4,5,7 and 8 are specific “qualities”, while 3 and 6 are the oscillators, and 9 is the Master”

Question: How do we know 3 and 6 are the oscillators??

Answer: Use doubling and halving again to find the recurring pattern.

3 x 2 =6

6 x 2 = 12 = ( 1 + 2 ) = 3

12 x 2 = 24 = ( 2 + 4 ) = 6

24 x 2 = 48 = (4 + 8 ) = 12 = ( 1 + 2 ) = 3

48 x 2 = 96 = ( 9 + 6 ) = 15 = ( 1 + 5 ) = 6

You see, 3,6,3,6,3,6,3,6,3,6……Toggling between the Duality…..

So it works the same everywhere. We are in a System of Duality. The 3 and 6 represent this perfectly, for in symbolism we have the triple 3 (3-3-3) Holy Trinity, and then on the other hand the triple 6 (6-6-6) Earth-Matrix. The number 9 is the Bridge Between the Duality.

The “shape of 3” using a platonic solid is the triangle (3 equal sides), while the “shape of 6” is the hexagon (6 equal sides). And remember when we referred to 6-6-6 as the Earth-Matrix (above)? Well, a 3-dimensional hexagon is….a dodecahedron, the same energetic shape that the latest studies show exists in the core of our Earth….the Earth-Matrix.

(David Wilcok’s latest book The Source Field Investigations show that there is a dodecahedron Crystal in the center of the Earth, which has properties more like a liquid than like a solid)

 

The last thing I’d like to point out today is the symbolism of the Yin-Yang. This symbol perfectly describes the 3-6-9 relationship. The Yin = 3, Yang = 6, and the Line that Divides the Duality = 9. (We will talk more about this relationship later…)

Here is another great thread if you get the chance!

http://philosophestoned.blogspot.com/

 

Stay tuned for Part 3!

 

-----Zemanu of the Stars

 

Views: 671

Tags: Energy, Free, Marko, Math, Point, Rodin, Vortex, Zero, dodecahedron

Add a Comment

You need to be a member of One Vibration to add comments!

Join One Vibration

Comment by Gary Val Tenuta on April 10, 2012 at 15:34

Love the cartoon! Thats awesome.

LOL Thanks. :-)

Yes, you're the kind of mind we need around here. You thoroughly do your homework, check out the sources in detail....

Well, there are a few here who are not so happy about my presence. One member even accused me of "being of the Dark" and "working for the Illuminati". LOL In the few years that I've been a member of OV I've said some things that some people didn't want to hear but I've never said anything that wasn't true. The problem is, some people don't want to know about anything that contradicts what they already believe. And they label themselves as "truth seekers". They're not genuinely seeking truth. They're just seeking more of anything that supports whatever they already believe is the truth. The hard part of being a genuine, authentic truth seeker is having to be flexible enough to accommodate new information even when (or especially when) that information clearly shows your preconceived belief to be false. Without that flexibility, we get nowhere. Just as an example, we all love having the miracle of the internet at our fingertips that allows us to have instant exchanges of thoughts and ideas. But, along the way, a lot of dedicated scientists and engineers had to give up a lot of their preconceived notions of how things work and adapt to new information in order for knowledge to progress to the point where the internet was finally able to become a reality.

My approach really is nothing more than an extension of my academic years (eons ago! LOL), studying sociology and social psychology. I spent countless hours in university libraries, doing research for term papers, pouring through scientific journals for information, etc. It was long, tedious work and if I learned anything at all from going through those professional journals it was the startling realization of just how complex even the most seemingly simple research subjects can be. One of the biggest revelations for me came in my very first year as a sociology student. The revelation was that so much of what most of us think we know is either just partially true or, in some cases, not true at all. What happens in the general society is the same thing that happens in smaller niche communities like, say, the New Age community. Someone will propose some idea that seems to make so much sense that it gets passed around as "fact" and no one challenges it. After a while that idea just becomes accepted as part of the so-called collective wisdom of the group (or an entire general population). Sometimes an idea will become accepted as fact simply because enough people "want" it to be true for any variety of reasons, political, social, personal, whatever. This was a major factor, for example, in the establishment of the racial prejudice that took hold in the South U.S. back in the days of slavery. The ramifications of that mindset are still with us today. That's just one example. There are many. Some are a big deal and some are trivial by comparison. But it does demonstrate the way it works.

I guess my point is that all ideas and concepts need to be challenged. By "challenged", I mean researched to see where the idea came from in the first place and then to see if it really has any merit. That's the only way we can get at the "truth". If no one ever challenged new ideas or even the established "common wisdom" of the day, we'd still believe a whole host of things that have since been proven false.

Sometimes I may 'go with the bandwagon' too quickly, but I do enjoy trying on these new concepts for size, 'trying' all the possibilities.

I think we all do that to one degree or another. Sometimes the latest idea on the bandwagon is just too enticing not to jump on board. Don't think I haven't been on my share of bandwagons. LOL

Yes, the article does kind of jump to some ignorant conclusions like you mentioned. what is this about 616? that sounds interesting.

The controversy came about with the discovery of some ancient texts:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_of_the_Beast#616

about the 'number of man' (and not 'a man'), this seems to go along with the 'carbon theory' okay,

and about John not being the author, I have not heard this theory yet

It's just an ongoing debate as to whether or not the John who wrote Revelation was the same John known as John the Apostle.

I will say this, I believe in the VERY near future, all of our "scientific precepts" will change, drastically, and this will be in large part due to how our understanding of Light will change, but...I could be wrong, wishfully thinking.

With scientific advances coming at such an increasingly rapid rate, you could be right. Makes me think of a documentary I watched last night. http://youtu.be/SfEnyxxSu4c It's called Time Trip. It's about the quest for the possibility of time travel. This quest necessarily involves questions about the very nature of reality, itself. The really ironic part of the quest, as presented in this documentary, is how it ends. The conclusion is that we may never know the nature of the "real" reality because we're not part of it. The explanation for that conundrum is that we may very well be nothing more than virtual beings existing in an extraordinarily advanced virtual reality simulation that was created by humans, right here on earth, a thousand years into the future. The really disturbing thing about it is that the reasoning behind this idea is actually quite plausible.

We'll all see soon enough I suppose. Although the phasing into our "Lightbodies" could well take place over 100 -1000 years rather than the quick transition all these sites like to talk about (2012). Im holding an open mind to it all.

Man, I'd have to agree with you on that. :-)

Your comments and knowledge are all greatly appreciated, I sure can learn alot from you, but dont forget, Wikipedia can also be biased in some instances ;) biased toward the 'sane thinking of the day', which is enforced by the higher institutions of learning (Illuminati control od education).

That's true to some degree. The Wikipedia entries that include plenty of references to other sources for related information (pro and con) are the ones that can be most trusted. From my experience in the world of academia (from community college to a 4-year college to University, including a 1-year stint as a research librarian at the Battelle Research Facility in Seattle)  I'd have to say 99% of the academic researchers and scientists around the world are working at their tasks in good faith. If there's any controlling going on (by Illuminati factions or anyone else), it's not so much in the research phases as it is in determining what parts of the results of that research actually gets revealed to the public.

This is why I love these Quantum subjects, numerology and new physics and stuff, because this is the field that is totally going to re-wire....everything! our whole way of thinking, way of Being

Can't argue with you on that. :-)

Comment by Rick Jordan on April 10, 2012 at 3:25

Love the cartoon! Thats awesome. Yes, you're the kind of mind we need around here. You thoroughly do your homework, check out the sources in detail....Sometimes I may 'go with the bandwagon' too quickly, but I do enjoy trying on these new concepts for size, 'trying' all the possibilities.

Yes, the article does kind of jump to some ignorant conclusions like you mentioned. what is this about 616? that sounds interesting.

about the 'number of man' (and not 'a man'), this seems to go along with the 'carbon theory' okay,

and about John not being the author, I have not heard this theory yet

I will say this, I believe in the VERY near future, all of our "scientific precepts" will change, drastically, and this will be in large part due to how our understanding of Light will change, but...I could be wrong, wishfully thinking.

We'll all see soon enough I suppose. Although the phasing into our "Lightbodies" could well take place over 100 -1000 years rather than the quick transition all these sites like to talk about (2012). Im holding an open mind to it all.

Your comments and knowledge are all greatly appreciated, I sure can learn alot from you, but dont forget, Wikipedia can also be biased in some instances ;) biased toward the 'sane thinking of the day', which is enforced by the higher institutions of learning (Illuminati control od education)

This is why I love these Quantum subjects, numerology and new physics and stuff, because this is the field that is totally going to re-wire....everything! our whole way of thinking, way of Being

 

Comment by Gary Val Tenuta on April 9, 2012 at 18:03

I like that Black Hole/Zero concept. Kinda makes sense in an esoteric sort of way. I'm FAR from being a theoretical physicist, much less an expert on black holes (major understatement!), so I don't know if black holes pump out any kind of information. I know they suck in a lot of stuff. LOL But the idea is cool.

I read the page you linked. Honestly, it's the kind of thing I don't put a lot of stock in. Mostly because I feel like the people who write stuff like that are trying to manipulate me into thinking they really know what they're talking about when, in fact, they don't. They try to make us think what they're saying has "scientific" backing when, more often than not, it doesn't. They tend to wrap their concepts in "scientific" jargon, often citing scientific research to support their claims. They know 99% of their readers won't bother to check out the sources they cite and most people won't really understand most of the scientific jargon that they toss around. And often they'll pick out fragments of genuine scientific research, but only a sentence or two out of context that seems to say one thing but, if you bother to check it out, it doesn't say that at all.  But... it sounds good. For example on that page, it says:

Dr. Max G. Lagally, BS, MS, Ph.D, is a Professor of Surface Science. In 2006, he began developing Silicon membranes in the Department of Materials Science and Engineering at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. In his research, he has discovered that the surface of a Silicon membrane can be functionalized to become biologically sensitive. He theorizes that it could bind DNA.[i] In other words, Silicon can support life.

So that all sounds really impressive. But I checked it out and in every instance, every scientific paper I could find by or about Dr. Lagally's work, it appears that his research is all about finding ways to enhance information transfer technology in computing systems. The DNA aspect is there, yes, but from what I could see, it doesn't have anything to do with the creation of biochemical life forms. He's talking about substituting the current type of computer chips (that perform the calculations) with DNA because, theoretically, DNA has a much higher capacity for information storage and can, theoretically, be used to function as a tool for making incredibly complex computations in a remarkably short amount of time. So the fact that he's able to combine the use of silicon and the function of DNA (in the manner in which he does) doesn't have anything to do with actually "blending" the two together to function as a living being of any kind. What the writer of that article then did was to jump immediately from the blurb about Dr. Lagally to saying, "In other words, Silicon can support life." The actual statement in the blurb was "the surface of a Silicon membrane can be functionalized to become biologically sensitive." That's not the same thing as saying, "In other words, Silicon can support life."

Another thing that happens is when someone posts an article like that, then everybody jumps on the bandwagon, copying and pasting the same thing over and over. I found this same article on sites all over the internet and everyone just accepts it as fact. And then we get statements like the one at the top of a galactic federation of light site where this same article was posted:

It's a short articles, but informative. Talks about what it means to become crystalline and how this is happening.  And something I've never heard before is how the scriptures in the Bible, talking about '666' and the mark of the beast were actually talking about this very thing, what is happening now. We ARE the best, and 666 is merely six electrons, six neutrons and six protons...the chemical making of a carbon-based atom, of a 'beast'.  Wow...how people have manipulated the writing and teachings of the Bible!!

The final sentence of that comment is just blurted out of ignorance. Of course the teachings of the Bible have been manipulated by some people and the writing (the actual text) of the Bible has been changed a bit here and there. But the Book of Revelation and the passage about the number 666 is still the same as when it was originally written. As far as I know, there are only three points of controversy concerning the Book of Revelation: (1) Some contend the number was originally intended to be 616; (2) Some contend that instead of being "the number of a man" it was supposed to be "the number of man" without the article, "a"; (3) Was John of Patmos really the author of Revelation and, if so, who was he, really? 

Anyway, that's the kind of thing I've seen so much of over the years that I just tend to not pay much attention anymore. It's all interesting conjecture and it can be entertaining from a creative point of view, but the way it's often presented seems disingenuous to me.

Man, I just read over what I wrote and it all sounds so negative. LOL I'm not really a negative person. I've just become a bit jaded and disappointed with all the misinformation and intentional disinformation that's out there.

Comment by Rick Jordan on April 9, 2012 at 14:08

oh yea, I forgot to mention, Yesterday a Connection was made! I suddenly was a great equation of themes...

ZERO = Black Holes

 

The concpet of Zero, which you said means "Cypher" and "Empty Space", PERFECTLY describe the esoteric nature of black holes. Apparently (according to the David Wikcock material) Black Holes pump of the Codes (Cypher?) from their "Empty Space", which really isnt empty, but FULL, in the fullest sense of the word

 

So out in the Universe we have these Realms where the numbers 1-9 are the basic building blocks of everything....and then interspaced we have these huge Black Holes, which are the Universal ZEROS, the empty space, that contain the "Cypher" for the information being emitting by the suns

Comment by Rick Jordan on April 9, 2012 at 14:02

yes, thats alot of scientific 'proof' for how it couldnt work, and who knows, maybe my imagination is getting the best of me, but I truly believe 'the rules of the system' themselves are changing, as new instructions for the template of Reality are beamed in to us through the photons of the stars. Especially concerning the problem of metabolism. In the 'version of events' that I see being a Great Possibility, we will not need so much food in the future, as we will be 'fed' by light itself. Here is a short and sweet article that sums up my understanding of it. I figured I would just give the link rather than cut and pasting everything:

http://hiddenlighthouse.wordpress.com/2010/11/19/from-beast-to-ligh...

Comment by Gary Val Tenuta on April 9, 2012 at 13:32

Wow, man, ViV sounds like a really ambitious project. Heavy duty stuff. Don't give up on it, no matter how long it takes. When it's done you'll be REALLY glad you stuck with it.

I have a hard time thinking the Revelatorium guy is just making it up. Could be but, after reading the excerpts from his humor books, it's quite clear that there are two completely different writing styles involved. So my guess is like you suggested, he's either channeling it or he's getting it from someone else and just posting it on his site. Here's a quote about him from a wikipedia page:

In a review of his book, it states that many of his ideas were influenced by William Ferguson, founder of the UFO organization called "Cosmic Circle of Fellowship." His writings use much of the same terminology and material used in the Revelatorium[4] Delannovah Starr Livingstone was a student of this and other movements.

I agree about the Carbon-12, 6-6-6 thing. That's an interesting way to interpret the 666-Beast number. Personally, I don't think that's what the passage in Revelation is referring to but it does seem like a nice bit of synchronicity, sort of emphasizing the "interconnectedness" principle.

About the channeled information going around that the earth (or life on earth) is changing to a silicon/crystaline base... there are some major problems with that idea. The stuff I've read (supposedly channeled from "Isis", as I recall) just doesn't really make sense when it's compared to well established knowledge about carbon-based vs. silicon-based biochemistry. For example, here's a piece from the wikipedia site:

---------------------------------------------

The most commonly proposed basis for an alternative biochemical system is the silicon atom, since silicon has many chemical properties similar to carbon and is in the same periodic table group, the carbon group. Like carbon, silicon can create molecules that are sufficiently large to carry biological information.[5]

However, silicon has several drawbacks as a carbon alternative. Silicon, unlike carbon, lacks the ability to form chemical bonds with diverse types of atoms necessary for the chemical versatility required for metabolism. Elements creating organic functional groups with carbon include hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, phosphorus, sulfur, and metals such as iron, magnesium, and zinc. Silicon, on the other hand, interacts with very few other types of atoms.[5] Moreover, where it does interact with other atoms, silicon creates molecules that have been described as "monotonous compared with the combinatorial universe of organic macromolecules".[5] This is because silicon atoms are much bigger, having a larger mass and atomic radius, and so have difficulty forming double or triple covalent bonds, which are important for a biochemical system.

Silanes, which are chemical compounds of hydrogen and silicon that are analogous to the alkane hydrocarbons, are highly reactive with water, and long-chain silanes spontaneously decompose. Molecules incorporating polymers of alternating silicon and oxygen atoms instead of direct bonds between silicon, known collectively as silicones, are much more stable. It has been suggested that silicone-based chemicals would be more stable than equivalent hydrocarbons in a sulfuric-acid-rich environment, as is found in some extraterrestrial locations.[6] Complex long-chain silicone molecules are still less stable than their carbon counterparts, though.

Another obstacle is that silicon dioxide (a common ingredient of many sands), the analog of carbon dioxide, is a non-soluble solid at the temperature range where water is liquid, making it difficult for silicon to be introduced into water-based biochemical systems even if the necessary range of biochemical molecules could be constructed out of it. Another problem with silicon dioxide is that it would be the product of aerobic respiration. If a silicon-based life form were to breathe using oxygen, as life on Earth does, it would possibly produce silicon dioxide as a by-product of this, assuming that the only difference between the two types of life is silicon in place of carbon. This implies that the exhaled product, silicon dioxide, would be a solid, thus filling the respiratory organs of the organism with sand. This however would be solved if the organism lives in temperatures of several hundred to thousand degrees, where the silicon dioxide becomes a liquid. Oxygen-breathing silicon life, if it exists, is therefore most likely to exist in environments with very high temperatures or pressure.

Finally, of the varieties of molecules identified in the interstellar medium as of 1998, 84 are based on carbon while only 8 are based on silicon.[7] Moreover, of those 8 compounds, four also include carbon within them. The cosmic abundance of carbon to silicon is roughly 10 to 1. This may suggest a greater variety of complex carbon compounds throughout the cosmos, providing less of a foundation upon which to build silicon-based biologies, at least under the conditions prevalent on the surface of planets.

Also, even though Earth and other terrestrial planets are exceptionally silicon-rich and carbon-poor (the relative abundance of silicon to carbon in the Earth's crust is roughly 925:1[8]), terrestrial life is carbon-based. The fact that carbon, though rare, has proven to be much more successful as a life base than the much more abundant silicon, may be evidence that silicon is poorly suited for biochemistry on Earth-like planets. For example: silicon is less versatile than carbon in forming compounds; the compounds formed by silicon are unstable and it blocks the flow of heat.[9] Even so, biogenic silica is used by some Earth life, such as the silicate skeletal structure of diatoms. This suggests that extraterrestrial life forms may have silicon-based structure molecules and carbon-based proteins for metabolic purposes, therefore enabling the ability to feed on a common resource on a terrestrial planet like Earth for building up the silicon-based part of their body.

Silicon compounds may possibly be biologically useful under temperatures or pressures different from the surface of a terrestrial planet, either in conjunction with or in a role less directly analogous to carbon.

A. G. Cairns-Smith has proposed that the first living organisms to exist on Earth were clay minerals—which were probably based on silicon.[10]

In cinematic and literary science fiction, a moment when man-made machines cross from nonliving to living, it is often posited, this new form would be the first example of non-carbon-based life. Since the advent of the microprocessor in the late 1960s, these machines are often classed as computers (or computer-guided robots) and filed under "silicon-based life", even though the silicon backing matrix of these processors is not nearly as fundamental to their operation as carbon is for "wet life".

---------------------------------------------

Given all of the conditions deemed necessary for the establishment and the survival of a silicon-based life form, I don't see how it's possible that such a thing could occur on earth as we know it. But it makes for good sci-fi about possible life forms on other planets. My guess is, we're stuck with 6-6-6. :-)

Comment by Rick Jordan on April 9, 2012 at 0:57

veeery interesting about the creator of The Revelatorium. I must admit, when I read chapter 21 about the Earth Matrix, I could go along with it, but then after giving you the link I went back and started reading from Chapter 1. I think it is awesome material, BUT just as in anything a person syhon's certain things from their imagination, and I just dont know if I can buy it myself....It sounds logical when you read it, but then....its tooo logical...I dont know, it has me a little confused myself. I am sure that this character you mention either "channels" the material or has been given it by another. Do you actually think hes making it all up....to confuse people?! I mean, could be, but thats so wierd...or he could be plain crazy....

But when I was reading, I felt a large degree of truth, perhaps with some imaginative bias thrown in. I have not researched the man as you have, so maybe I should before reading further.

But you cant disagree with the Carbon 12 containing 6 neutrons, protons and electrons. Thats a fact found all throughout the internet. So that part is at least "true".

And I wonder, as the Earth is apparently moving from being carbon-based to crystaline-based, doesnt that mean that this 6-6-6 arrangement will change, and that there will be a "new" number for that in the near future.

 

About my work-in-progress-for-far-too-long, ViV, it has a really cool meaning. It is never explained outright in the book, but you figure it out. The two main characters are named Victor, in their separate worlds, and the antagonist is none other than an actual entity called the i-Self, which is the sum total of all the consciousness fragments of selfish intent. He is like a 'Devil' figure who exists , and is 'fed' by the energy of humanity's sense of "self". So basically as the two Victors fight the inner spiritual war AND an outer one, at the same time, they must both fight their inner i-self and the outer Entity Demon-King known as the i-Self, hence the title: ViV

 

Victor, and the i-Self

and then Victor again

just a case of ViV

in the end

Comment by Gary Val Tenuta on April 8, 2012 at 23:32

The premise for your novel sounds pretty cool! I'm curious about the title. What does it mean?

I've stumbled onto that Revelatorium site in the past and read a few of the topics. The problem I have with that kind of material is that I just don't know what to do with it. It kind of reminds me of things like the Urantia material or J.J. Hurtak's stuff in his book, The Book of Knowledge: The Keys of Enoch, etc. I read it and then about all I do is say, hmm... that was interesting, and then move on to something else. Most of the information from sources like that is unprovable so you just have to kind of take it with a grain of salt. I don't know what the source (or alleged source) is for the material on the Revelatorium site. I did a little digging and found out his name (or at least one of his names) is Delannovah Starr Livingstone. Curiously, he also goes by another name: Zuerrnnovahh-Starr Livingstone. That's the name he uses for a site called Educate Yourself (http://educate-yourself.lege.net/). Then, to top it all off, he also goes by the name of Cliff Livingstone, the author of a series of humorous memoirs (http://www.cliffr.com/) that are about as far from the kind of thing presented on his other sites as you can get. He's also building what appears to be a kind of internet search site (http://www.lookwhole.com/) that apparently started out with another domain name but it ended up in a legal dispute that he and his partner lost. Quite an interesting character, to say the least. I'd like to meet this guy. :-)

Comment by Rick Jordan on April 8, 2012 at 13:57

I was just looking up some more info about the 6-6-6 Earth Matrix and here is an excerpt from a great site I found:

When you started incarnating into Earth's lower dimensional time line structures, you inadvertently incurred the matrixing structures of the animal kingdom as part and parcel of your outer consciousness expression as it was into the animal kingdom matrixes that you initially incarneted. You not only ended up with a specific lower substance material component in your lower consciousness matrix from the gene pool of your parents and the material Substances of your mother, you also had the lower dimensional matrixing factors of the animal kingdom to deal with, gift of the Planet.

Worse, through it you incurred a beast condition within your lower consciousness self.

'Here is wisdom. Let him who hath understanding count the number of the beast for it is also the number of a Man. And that number is six, six score, and six'.

Six, six, six itself is not the problem. The problem is that through it, both your outer bodily manifestation and your outer consciousness aspect are still directly attuned to the frequencies of the animal kingdom.

Despite the compelling connotation, the number does not refer to credit card numbers, social insurance numbers, or any other such personal identification (pin) type numbers of outer world determinology. It refers to both your physical body composition and to a type of outer consciousnesses behaviour which among one of its many cankers would consider such herdant numbering schemes useful within a society.

Specifically, it is because the outer bodily manifestations of Earth's animal kingdom is carbon based. The number 666 relates specifically to the particular type of Carbon atom comprising the main constituent.

The particular Carbon atom is Carbon - 12. Carbon - 12 is the most abundant form of carbon on Earth, accounting for nearly ninety nine percent of all known forms of Carbon. Carbon - 12 is an isotope of Carbon that consists of 6 protons, 6 electrons and 6 neutrons. I.e., the number 6-6-6.

As Man is currently incarnated into the physical realm under the carbon atom rules for the animal kingdom manifestations, 6-6-6 is also the number for a Man.

The number also reflects in the outer consciousness aspect of your outer projection through the lower triangle of your outer matrix. Specifically the number refers to the particular component within your outer consciousness matrix which is still animal kingdom attuned.

The tie in reflects directly to the outer consciousness aspect of your outer projection through the lower triangle of your outer matrix. Most specifically the number relates to the particular component within your outer consciousness matrix which is still attuned to the animal kingdom in and of itself.

 

The entire article (chapter) can be found at: http://www.revelatorium.com/Starrgram21.htm

 

Comment by Rick Jordan on April 8, 2012 at 13:25

Your books sound great! I think Im going to have to order The Ezekiel Code soon, its just my cup of tea. I'm actually a writer myself (but not yet published). I'm working on a novel called ViV and it is similar to yours in that it combines all my knowledge into a ficitonal tale, however mine would be considered sci-fi/fantasy. My main character also gets "downloads', but in this case they are coming from an actual entity on another world, a soul-counterpart, or Oversoul-type. The chapters alternate between the lower Earth-human and the higher "Extraterrestrial", as they embark upon a quest, helping each other through mental 'projections'. And the real kicker is that the higher soul gets downloads from an even higher entity, but those only come in the form of esoteric poetry....haha, its going to be very artistic when finished.

 

Your gematria is fascinating...I too think in terms of equations quite often, but never using numerical values, but rather just a mental string-list of words and concepts that equal each other.

I have known since childhood about the significance of 144. your equations seem spot on to me.

The very first comment I put on this blog were some pictures of the yin-yang symbol with the corresponding numbers of 3, 6, and 9. If you Google that info, TONS of stuff will come up relating it to the Rodin torrus, etc...It seems to make 3 relate to the 'light', 6 to the 'darkness', and 9 the Master Line that Divides and Unites them.

 

Also, about 6-6-6 as the Earth Matrix, one of the reasons relates to the carbon molecule.

Online Magazine

About

Submit your article

Use your credit card or bank account or Pay Pal at the link above. We THANK YOU for your support! 

OV Networking Toolbox

How to Articles
HELP Department

Latest Activity

Dorothy Peer Promiscuo commented on Lorie Renker Floener's photo
20 minutes ago
Dorothy Peer Promiscuo commented on Lux OV Admin's photo
21 minutes ago
Gun-Britt Lund replied to Gun-Britt Lund's discussion Heavenletter #4899 The Interconnectedness of Everything on Earth , April 24, 2014 in the group Portal of Peace and Light
23 minutes ago
Dorothy Peer Promiscuo commented on Lux OV Admin's photo
25 minutes ago
Gun-Britt Lund replied to Gun-Britt Lund's discussion COUNCIL OF THE ELOHIM - PRAYER TO REMOVE THE OLD MATRIX 4-24/2014 ~ via Jose Sanchez in the group Portal of Peace and Light
26 minutes ago
Mária Fehér shared Gun-Britt Lund's discussion on Facebook
28 minutes ago
Dorothy Peer Promiscuo replied to Gun-Britt Lund's discussion COUNCIL OF THE ELOHIM - PRAYER TO REMOVE THE OLD MATRIX 4-24/2014 ~ via Jose Sanchez in the group Portal of Peace and Light
41 minutes ago
Dorothy Peer Promiscuo replied to Gun-Britt Lund's discussion Heavenletter #4899 The Interconnectedness of Everything on Earth , April 24, 2014 in the group Portal of Peace and Light
46 minutes ago
Gun-Britt Lund added 6 discussions to the group Portal of Peace and Light
59 minutes ago
Gun-Britt Lund replied to Gun-Britt Lund's discussion Seeing Through a Glass Darkly - Knowing Whispers Submitted by will on Thu, 04/24/2014 in the group Portal of Peace and Light
1 hour ago
Gun-Britt Lund replied to Gun-Britt Lund's discussion Today´s point of peace - April 24, 2014 - Dawn Katar and the Ascended Masters in the group Portal of Peace and Light
1 hour ago
Gun-Britt Lund replied to Gun-Britt Lund's discussion Today´s point of peace - April 24, 2014 - Dawn Katar and the Ascended Masters in the group Portal of Peace and Light
1 hour ago
Gun-Britt Lund replied to Gun-Britt Lund's discussion Heavenletter #4899 The Interconnectedness of Everything on Earth , April 24, 2014 in the group Portal of Peace and Light
1 hour ago
Gun-Britt Lund replied to Gun-Britt Lund's discussion The Heart Knows - Knowing Whispers in the group Portal of Peace and Light
1 hour ago
Dorothy Peer Promiscuo replied to Gun-Britt Lund's discussion Today´s point of peace - April 24, 2014 - Dawn Katar and the Ascended Masters in the group Portal of Peace and Light
1 hour ago
Gun-Britt Lund replied to Gun-Britt Lund's discussion COUNCIL OF THE ELOHIM - PRAYER TO REMOVE THE OLD MATRIX 4-24/2014 ~ via Jose Sanchez in the group Portal of Peace and Light
1 hour ago
Gun-Britt Lund replied to Gun-Britt Lund's discussion COUNCIL OF THE ELOHIM - PRAYER TO REMOVE THE OLD MATRIX 4-24/2014 ~ via Jose Sanchez in the group Portal of Peace and Light
1 hour ago
Gun-Britt Lund replied to Gun-Britt Lund's discussion Message of light - STOPPING - Alexandra Solnado - April 23, 2014 in the group Portal of Peace and Light
1 hour ago
Gun-Britt Lund replied to Gun-Britt Lund's discussion 23rd & 24th April 2014: Cardinal Grand Cross by SarahVarcas on 23/04/2014 in the group Portal of Peace and Light
1 hour ago
Gun-Britt Lund replied to Gun-Britt Lund's discussion Healing Past Selves with the Light of your Present Awareness 23 April 2014 - 6:30am | DL Zeta in the group Portal of Peace and Light
1 hour ago

© 2014   Created by rose.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service