Starchild Skull 2010 DNA Result

Comment

Comment by Victoria Munson-Engelkes on August 11, 2010 at 5:36pm

Excellent clip!!! I have been waiting for the answer,even though I have already felt this was
an early hybrid. This was not the first hybrid, however. Someday, the world will know the truth
about Jeshua Ben Joseph, (Jesus), who also had Pleiadian DNA.

Comment by Illumination OV Admin on August 11, 2010 at 11:35am

The real 'missing link' between us and the stars! Thanks for posting.

Comment by Murray Morison on August 11, 2010 at 5:44am

Thanks Sally-Jane, they have their reputation to think of, so it makes it more interesting and a bit more plausible.

Murray

Comment by Sally on August 11, 2010 at 5:15am

Chewbit,
I would like to have more information on Yaweh, is he the same god referred too in the Nag Hammadi Library Yaldaboath? From what star did Yaweh come from I find this very interesting.

Murray ,
Yes last summer I saw a program on the History channel about the star child scientist proved it's DNA was human woman but the father was unknown?

Espavo,
sally

Comment by Murray Morison on August 11, 2010 at 1:05am

This is interesting, certainly.

Did it actually show on the History Channel? what is the evidence for that?

I would like to think this could be the 'living proof' as it were - but we all should remember that the Piltdown Man, discovered in England, eventually proved to be a hoax. And isn't it interesting that
a) all the evidence apart from the skulls went in a 'flash flood' (see various sites about Mr. Pye), and b) he started in 1999 from the assumption that this was a "Starchild". this means that his approach was to prove a point rather than open-mindedly test a theory.
Yet the evidence is arresting, if it can be trusted, and deserves an explanation. For one, I would like to know about the DNA profiles of money skulls (the most likely origin of a hoax).
All in all, food for thought . . .

Murray

Comment by Sally on August 10, 2010 at 4:27pm

Christopher,
Did you get to see this on the history channel? I watched it and gloated because it proved to my husband something is out there he watched couldn't peel his eyes off the show........so glad you posted this thank you .

Espavo,
sally

Comment by Crystal Marie on August 10, 2010 at 4:00pm

Thank you!!

Comment by Ana G on August 10, 2010 at 3:50pm

Wow, mind-blowing with scientific evidence. We have modern day evidence in the form of petroglyphs, heiroglyphs, Egyptian mythology, ancient mythology/stories of other cultures, that we have been visited for a long time. Is it possible we have been "seeded" all along? I was a biology/pre-med major in college in the 80's, and I vividly recall one professor suggesting that there were no scientific theories to explain how sentient human arose in such a short time if we rely on accepted theories of genetic drift, mutation, and survival of the fittest (Darwinism, which is gradual). He unabashedly suggested that life on this planet probably came from outer space, but then once life got hold, mathematically, it was impossible for a complex creature as human (and I would add, all mammals) to have randomly evolved to present day levels in the time frame that is now accepted that life has existed on Earth. There is so much that we still don't know, but that I believe will continue being revealed to us as we evolve, and can grok. . At least one scientist believes the evolutionary changes occurred more quickly, thus debunking Darwinism. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/02/070210170623.htm The alien connection could be the answer! Makes sense to me.

Comment by StarBird on August 10, 2010 at 3:24pm

Pretty kewl!

Comment by cookie romano on August 10, 2010 at 2:28pm

Very interesting video. Thank you for shareing.

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page